LSATMax and COVID-19:
Amid these difficult times, we're lowering the price on all courses.
Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
June 2016 LSAT
Science teacher: An abstract knowledge of science is very seldom useful for the decisions that adults typically make ...
on December 15 at 02:57PM
Why is E correct? Why is C incorrect?
on December 16 at 04:53PM
Hereâ€™s a breakdown of the argument:
Premise: An abstract knowledge of science is seldom useful in making decisions in oneâ€™s daily life.
Premise: But, skills taught in secondary school should be useful for making decisions in daily life.
Conclusion: Secondary school should teach students to use science to evaluate practical issues like health and public policy instead.
Youâ€™re looking for an extra premise that the argument is currently assuming.
(C) is incorrect because it is too strong of a statement. The answer choice states that adults with an abstract knowledge of science are â€œno betterâ€ at evaluating daily issues than those without such knowledge. But, the argument does not make such strong statements. Rather premise 1 states that an abstract knowledge of science is â€œseldomâ€™ useful. These are not the same thing.
(E) is correct because it fills in the missing premise. The conclusion is assuming that the ability to evaluate practical issues like health and public policy (see the conclusion) is useful for making decisions in daily life (see premise 1). This answer choice fills in that gap in the reasoning.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.