Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Campus Rep Internship
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
June 2016 LSAT
Families with underage children make up much of the population, but because only adults can vote, lawmakers in democr...
on December 15 at 02:58PM
Why is E correct? Why is D incorrect?
on December 17 at 09:19PM
Hi Ryan, thanks for the question.
This is a Strengthen with Necessary Premise question and as such, we will need to identify the answer choice that contains an assumption that the argument depends on. To test this, we negate the answer choice and examine whether this negated form weakens the argument.
Answer choice E is correct because when negated it becomes: "A group of people cannot be fairly represented in a democracy if some members of that group can vote on behalf of others in that group"
If allowing some to vote on behalf of others is inherently unfair, then the argument collapses as allowing parents to vote on behalf of their children would not result in fair representation.
Answer choice D when negated becomes: "It is fair for lawmakers to favour the interests of people who have the vote over the interests of people who do not have the vote"
The idea that just because it is fair to favour one group over another, does not mean that families with parents voting for their underage children would not receive fair representation. It does not weaken the argument.
I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any other questions!
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.