A new treatment for muscle pain that looked very promising was tested in three separate studies. Although the results...

on December 24 at 10:57PM

A

How do different criteria equate to flawed methodology?

1 Reply

Shunhe on January 1 at 03:47AM

Hi @tomgbean,

The flawed methodology of the studies describes a potential problem with the process of the study that ended up suggesting the treatment for muscle pain was effective. Meanwhile, the not uniform criteria of the judges in the baking contest describes a potential problem with the process of the judging that ended up suggesting the cake was best. Hope this helps describe the parallel between the two.