on December 28 at 04:52AM
The argument says almost all agree with Wangs Law, and also, almost all agree with E.B experiment. Then goes on to conclude that most therefore reject the M hypothesis since believing in both contradicts the M hypothesis.
Isnâ€™t this a classic case of incorrectly concluding from the fact that â€œMost Câ€™S are Aâ€™s, and Most Bâ€™s are Aâ€™sâ€ that â€œmost Aâ€™s are both C and Bâ€ when the best we can say is SOME Aâ€™s are both?
In the context of this Q - the best we can say is SOME scientists agree with some Wangs Law and EB experiment, and thus reject M hypothesis. UNLESS.... we choose answer choice b which guarantees there is overlap.
Where did i go wrong? I was feeling pretty confident when I chose the answer choice - haha! Thanks guys :)
Skylar on December 29 at 12:09AM
on January 2 at 11:22PM