Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
June 2010 LSAT
The author uses the word "immediacy" (line 39) most likely in order to express
on January 8, 2020
how do you properly conclude a sufficient condition?
on January 19 at 10:55PM
In short, we can never conclude a sufficient condition. However, we can conclude that a sufficient condition did not happen.
If I get a bad haircut (BHC), my girlfriend will break up with me (BU).
BHC - - - - - - - - - > BU
Let's say that my girlfriend breaks up with me. What can we conclude? Nothing. We know that it's possible that I got a bad haircut, but we cannot be certain that this is the reason. There might be a wide variety of reasons. The necessary condition does not guarantee the sufficient condition.
BU - - - - - - - - -> BHC is not valid. We cannot simply flip our sufficient and necessary conditions.
No matter what happens in my relationship, we cannot conclude that I got a bad haircut.
There is one conclusion that we can make, and that is with our contrapositive.
not BU - - - - - - - - - > not BHC
If my girlfriend did not break up with me, we can say for certain that I did not get a bad haircut. But we can never say for certain that I did get a bad haircut.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.