dalaal on February 14 at 04:42PM
I have three questions relating to the second exercise in the Intro to LR lesson:
First: I am having a hard time to distinguish between the argument exchange -misinterpretation question type and the error of reasoning when the question stem includes two views such as this statement: as a rebuttal of Giselle's argument, Antoine's response is ineffective because. Could you offer any help to better understand the difference in what the question is asking me for?
Second: I treated the question stem that : as error of reasoning of the same kind as one contained in the passage is present in each of EXCEPT, as a Bizarro Flawed Parallel Reasoning question time, whereas the answer for it was flawed parallel reasoning. Why didn't we consider the EXCEPT used in this question stem as a Bizarro type?
Third: I sometimes have difficulty differentiating between a MUST be TRUE question stem and an Argument Completion question stem. I realize that the latter usually contains the term complete, but I don't believe I understand the difference between the two types in their essence (i.e. not just the phrasing). Could you please illustrate on this more?
on February 16 at 07:55PM
dalaal on February 19 at 05:30PM