on February 14, 2020
I have three questions relating to the second exercise in the Intro to LR lesson:
First: I am having a hard time to distinguish between the argument exchange -misinterpretation question type and the error of reasoning when the question stem includes two views such as this statement: as a rebuttal of Giselle's argument, Antoine's response is ineffective because. Could you offer any help to better understand the difference in what the question is asking me for?
Second: I treated the question stem that : as error of reasoning of the same kind as one contained in the passage is present in each of EXCEPT, as a Bizarro Flawed Parallel Reasoning question time, whereas the answer for it was flawed parallel reasoning. Why didn't we consider the EXCEPT used in this question stem as a Bizarro type?
Third: I sometimes have difficulty differentiating between a MUST be TRUE question stem and an Argument Completion question stem. I realize that the latter usually contains the term complete, but I don't believe I understand the difference between the two types in their essence (i.e. not just the phrasing). Could you please illustrate on this more?
Already have an account?
on February 16, 2020
on February 19, 2020