Paleomycologists, scientists who study ancient forms of fungi, are invariably acquainted with the scholarly publicati...
shafieiavaon February 26, 2020
Diagram/approach?
Can you diagram this question? During my first attempt of the question I didn't see clear diagrammable statements, but at a second glance the flawed parallel reasoning I believe is being shown is just reverses? I diagrammed the stimulus as P>ASP; ASP; Therefore P. Then I diagrammed the correct answer as GAD> CFD; CFD; Therefore GAD. Which to my understanding also just reverses. Can someone confirm my analysis of the stimulus and correct answer here? Thanks in advance.
Reply
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
Happy to help. Here's how I'd diagram this question:
Premise 1: Paleomycologist - >Acquainted with publications of all other paleomycologists
Premise 2: Mansour - >Acquainted with the publication of a paleomycologist (Professor DeAngelis)
Conclusion: Mansour - >Paleomycologist
We can simply the structure of this argument to
Premise 1: A - >B
Premise 2: C - >D
Conclusion: C - >A
This is obviously a flawed argument structure. We need to find the answer choice that mirrors this flawed structure.
(A) says, "When a flight on Global Airlines is delayed, all connecting Global Airlines flights are also delayed so that the passengers can make their connections. Since Frieda’s connecting flight on Global was delayed, her first flight must have also been a delayed Global Airlines flight."
Here's how we can diagram (A):
Premise 1: Delayed flight on Global Airlines - >Delayed connecting flight
Premise 2: Freida's flight - >Delayed connecting flight on Global Airlines
Conclusion: Freida's Flight - >Delayed flight on Global Airlines
This structure simplifies to
Premise 1: A - >B
Premise 2: C - >D
Conclusion: C - >A
This matches the flawed structure we found in the stimulus, so (A) is the correct answer choice.
Does this make sense? Let us know if you have any other questions!