June 2010 LSAT
Section 5
Question 14
The author uses the word "immediacy" (line 39) most likely in order to express
Replies
SamA on April 12, 2020
Hello @kenken,Your first diagram would be for a standard if/then statement.
If A, then B.
A ---> B
not B ---> not A
It allows for the possibility of A & B existing, or B by itself, but A cannot exist without B.
Your second diagram could represent an either/or relationship. Either A or B.
not A ---> B
not B ---> A
Unless it specifically says "but not both," then both A and B can exist. Notice that both sufficient conditions are negative. If we are told that B exists, we have no idea what effect this has on A, and vice versa. Only if we are told that B doesn't exist can we make a conclusion about A.
hadiyah2 on April 17, 2020
Hello, I understand that "either A or B" means that A and B could exist at the same time, but I don't see how that is translated by the diagramNot A-->B
not B--->A
it seems like they cannot exist at the same time. What am I missing?
ohanamgt on January 2, 2021
your example does not specify "not both" so, the both could exist - its a possibilityohanamgt on June 15, 2021
second is either/or OR both