June 2010 LSAT
Section 5
Question 14
The author uses the word "immediacy" (line 39) most likely in order to express
Replies
AnthonyH on June 14, 2020
Was this question ever answered? I interpreted the "NOT" to apply directly to the statement that follows as well. Could someone clarify this for us please? Thanks again!AnthonyH on June 14, 2020
Was this question ever answered? I interpreted the "NOT" to apply directly to the statement that follows as well. Could someone clarify this for us please? Thanks again!AnthonyH on June 25, 2020
Hello folks, this seems to be a recurring challenge for me in the Sufficient & Necessary homework questions as well. Please chime in with some clarity at your earliest convenience.Thank you!
Brett-Lindsay on July 2, 2020
I did that one intuitively and was surprised at its complexity when Mehran explained it.I remember something about the "until" being the necessary condition, regardless of the order of the sentence it appears in, so
"Yet NOT until teachers have the power to make decisions in their own classrooms can they enable their students to make their own decisions."
equals
"Teachers will NOT be able to enable their students to make their own decisions until they (the teachers) have the power to make decisions in their own classrooms."
According to the "until/without" rule, the until condition becomes the necessary condition and the other is negated and becomes the sufficient condition:
"Yet NOT until teachers have the power to make decisions in their own classrooms can they enable their students to make their own decisions."
becomes
If teachers CAN help students MoD, then the teachers must have the PMD.
The original "not" at the beginning of the sentence is negated away (two negatives make a positive, like in math) so the sentence becomes positive.
I hope that helps, and I hope I'm right :)