The author uses the word "immediacy" (line 39) most likely in order to express
kenson April 23, 2020
S&N diagramming
Are both these statement either or statement and are they the only ones?
1. not P---->R, not R--->P (either P or R or both)
2. P--->not R, R---->not P (either P or R or but not both)
I always thought we look at the right side of the diagram to conclude whether a statement indicates both or not both, is this correct?
Is there a situation where both sufficient and necessary is negated?
for example, not P--->not R, R--->P? Thank you.
Reply
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
The top statement is either or, while the second statement is either or, but not both.
The first statement is correctly diagrammed, however the second is incomplete.
Because we must show that one of the two must occur when we say "either P or R but not both", we must also note that
not P --> R, and not R --> P
This still holds in addition to what you have (P -> not R, and R -> not P)
As for a situation that has both sufficient and necessary negated. There is no special indicator or formation that would lead to this. It would simply be phrased with both the sufficient and necessary terms negated.
E.g. If I do not play music, I will not hear my favourite song.
NOT PM -> NOT HFS HFS -> PM
I hope this helps. Please let me know if you'd like me to elaborate further.