Everyone should have access to more than one newspaper, for there are at least two sides to every story. Since all si...
kenson May 2, 2020
question 22
Since all sides of an important story should be covered, and no newspaper adequately covers all sides of every one of its stories, some important stories would not be adequately covered if there were only one newspaper.
Isn't the statement saying that since no one newspaper can adequately cover all sides of important stories, some important storied would not be covered? If so, how can we conclude that answer choice A is correct? Thanks in advance.
Reply
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
Th author doesn't say as a premise that no newspaper can cover all sides of important stories, just that they can't cover all sides of all total stories. This leaves open the possibility that the stories that they fail to cover all sides of are unimportant.