October 2005 LSAT - Section 1 - Question 24
BenMingov May 8, 2020
Hi Dannyod, thanks for the question.dannyod May 9, 2020
Ok thanks, I think I understand. It seems like the part of the question stem "strongest reason for thinking" gives the most grace for this being the correct answer. The answer doesn't have to provide a scenario that absolutely invalidates the principle, more so it just needs to raise suspicion for it's plausibility in all cases. Does that sound right?