June 1991 LSAT Section 4 Question 5

Senator Strongwood reported that, contrary to a study cited by the administration, a thorough study by his own party ...

Avi on May 10, 2020

Why B, Not C?

After reviewing the question, I guess I see why B could be the answer because he must assume that his data is better for if not there is no reason to say what he said. But why is C not good? Is it because that he didn't say explicitly that his opponents lack common sense, only hint it?

Replies

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Ben on May 10, 2020

Hi Avif, thanks for the question.

That is exactly right. There is a difference between Senator Strongwood "expressly" stating something and hinting it. By saying something like "anybody with a brain knows this" does not mean that you are saying the person you are speaking to has no brain. Rather this would be a rude remark that may hint your feelings about their possession of a brain!

I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any other questions or would like me to elaborate further.

Avi on May 10, 2020

Thanks! That was a tricky one. Seems like the rule is pay very close attention to language