June 2010 LSAT Section 5 Question 18

Based on the passage, it can be concluded that the author and Broyles-González hold essentially the same attitude toward

Nishant-Varma on May 14, 2020

Practice Question 4

For answer choice C, since it says "some exuberant people who are actors," wouldn't that change the way we diagram it? It is not just saying exuberant people, but it is saying exuberant people who are actors. We know that all acts are EP, but we do not know that all EP are actors. So by specifying that they are referring to some EP who are actors, wouldn't that change anything?

Replies

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Madelynn22 on May 18, 2020

I am wondering the same thing..?

amh on May 25, 2020

I had the same confusion - Could we get an answer to this?

amh on May 25, 2020

Okay I've thought about this more, and I think I would instead emphasize the "SP-some-A --> EP" part that was proven before getting to the questions. Some shy people are actors, and all actors are exuberant, so some shy people are exuberant actors, meaning some exuberant actors are shy.