In practice the government will have the last word on what an individual's rights are, because its police will do wha...
TejasMay 22, 2020
3rd sentence as conclusion
"anyone who thinks it is must believe that the government's view is a correct view have only such moral rights as the government chooses to grant, which means that they have no moral rights at all." I thought this was the conclusion, can anyone please explain?
Reply
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
This statement supports the idea that the government cannot be the arbiter of rights, because if it were, then people would have no moral rights whatsoever. This supports the idea that government should and cannot be considered the ultimate arbiter of rights.
