Michael on May 28 at 05:10AM
I am confused on how to structure the last rule. The rule says “neither ty nor ramundo appear in any photograph that Wendy appears in”. Since the sentence seems like the previous rules (stating necessary first and then a sufficient condition) I want to set the rule up like this: W—-> not T & not R.
However, the setup has it set up like this: T <—/—> W, R <—/—> W.
How could you have known the setup wasn’t like a normal conjunction setup?
Also, is the setup T <—/—> W like a normal sufficient/necessary setup where we can not know anything about the sufficient condition if the necessary condition is present?
Thanks for your help!
Ben on May 28 at 06:20PM
Michael on May 28 at 07:07PM