If Weeks examines H, then any of the following could be true EXCEPT:

bcross on June 5, 2020

Can some please provide an explanation?

This game setup and all questions are confusing me, and there isn’t an explanation anywhere as far as I can tell.

Reply
Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

SamA on June 6, 2020

Hello @bcross,

I'll help you break this one down.
We have 5 technicians: R S T W X
Assigned to 3 computers:

F: _ _
G: _ _
H: _ _

If you'll notice, there are 6 spots and 5 technicians. Someone is going to be included twice.

Rule 1: Sf ---> Xg
Rule 2: Wf ---> Xh
Rule 3: SW not together
Rule 4: RT

I am going to make diagrams based on the last rule, because it limits us to 3 distinct scenarios.

1.
F: R T
G: _ _
H: _ _

2.
F: _ _
G: R T
H: _ _

3.
F: _ _
G: _ _
H: R T

There are not many other inferences that I can make for scenario 1. Just remember that W and S must be separate, one in G and the other in H.
1.
F: R T
G: W/S _
H: W/S _

There is more that I can add to scenario 2. Computer G is full, so X cannot be there. Taking the contrapositive of Rule 1, we know that S cannot be in F. Therefore it must be in H. W must be in F, which puts X into H. Only one uncertain spot remains.

2.
F: W _
G: R T
H: S H

We can make similar inferences for scenario 3. There is no room for X in H. Using the contrapositive of Rule 2, we know that W is not with F. Therefore, W will be placed in G, pushing S into F. Using rule 1, we place X with G. Only one uncertain spot remains.

3.
F: S _
G: W X
H: R T

Using a setup like this one, you will move through the questions very quickly.