Mayme on July 17 at 09:42PM
I understand that, realistically, A is drastic, but in terms of the argument, why do we eliminate it? If a government is justified in preventing advertisements that encourage unhealthy behavior but cigarette advertisements cannot be made illegal if fatty food advertisements are legal, do we not resolve this by making both illegal?
Maybe I just missed something in the original argument or am not thinking about this correctly. Thanks in advance!
Shunhe on July 20 at 06:16PM