June 2010 LSAT
Section 5
Question 14
The author uses the word "immediacy" (line 39) most likely in order to express
Replies
shunhe on August 7, 2020
Hi @Greer,Thanks for the question! So I just pulled a random missing premise flashcard to go through. We’re given the following information:
P: Y —> C
P: ? ?P: A —> ~B
C: B —> C
So now the question becomes: how do we get to B —> C? Well, in the premises, we want to have a B in the sufficient premise. That way, we can go
B —> Stuff
And we want to have a C in the necessary condition in the premises. That way, we can have
Stuff —> C
And then ideally we’d link that together to get
B —> Stuff —> C
Which would get us the conclusion we want, B —> C. Now take a look at the third premise. We have ~B in the necessary condition. Well, if we take the contrapositive of this, we’ll get B in the sufficient condition, which is what we want! So let’s take the contrapositive of premise 3, or
B —> ~A
And note that the first premise gives us C in the necessary condition, we have
B—> ~A
Y —> C
Now we want something that bridges these two to get us to B —> C. We can do that by connecting the ~A and Y! So from
B — > ~A and Y —> C (1)
we can just say
B —> ~A —> Y —> C (2)
Which would get us B —> C. And how can we get (2) from (1)? Well, if we assume
~A —> Y is true, and that’s the missing premise that we need. Note that the contrapositive also works, ~Y —> A.
Hope this helps! Feel free to ask any other questions that you might have.
ssquare on August 8, 2020
Thank you, Shunhe. This is very helpful!Greer on August 9, 2020
thank you!!shunhe on August 10, 2020
Glad you found it helpful!