Fiona on September 5 at 11:22PM
I understand now why B is correct but I found A to be persuasive because the Vietnam war seemed to be a catalyst for the War Resolution Act, and the new provisions for not-war armed conflict seemed like a "new interpretation" to me.
Can you help me with what I'm missing?
For reference, A says, "showing how the Vietnam conflict led to a new interpretation of the Constitution's provisions for use of the military".
Victoria on September 23 at 02:54PM