Thanks for the question! So we’re basically told in this question that there’s two kinds of horror stories, mad scientist ones and monstrous beasts ones. So we can diagram this as
Horror Story —> Mad scientist v Monstrous Beast
We’re also told at the end that both of these kinds of horror stories share two features, describing violations of the law of nature and intending to produce dread in the reader. We can diagram this as
Horror Story —> Describe violations of the laws of nature & Intended to produce dread in reader
Now, let’s take a look at (A). It tells us that all descriptions of monstrous beasts describe violations of the laws of nature. Well, this could certainly be true if we knew that all descriptions of monstrous beasts were horror stories. But do we know that? No, we don’t. There could be descriptions of monstrous beasts in other kinds of stories, like fantasy novels or something. And so we can’t get (A) from the statements, which makes it wrong in this Must Be True question.
So now let’s take a look at (E), which tells us that some stories that employ symbolism describe violations of the laws of nature. Well, we know that some horror stories about monstrous beasts have symbolism (specifically, the monster symbolizing psychological disturbance int he protagonist). So we know that
Horror stories <—some—> Symbolism ?But remember, we know that
Horror stories —> Describe violations of laws of nature
And so we can say that
Describe violations of laws of nature <—some—> Symbolism
and that’s what (E) says.
Hope this helps! Feel free to ask any other questions that you might have.