December 2004 LSAT Section 3 Question 26

Based on the information in the passage, the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following sta...

Mansi-Arora on December 8, 2020

Error in Answer B?

Is answer choice (b) wrong because it states "provincial courts are not authorized to rule on the definition of property rights."...and the passage never says if they are authorized or not? Just want to make sure I understand why this was eliminated.

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

shunhe on January 7, 2021

Hi @Mansi-Arora,

Thanks for the question! Yes, that’s correct! There’s no evidence in the passage to suggest that the provincial courts are not authorized to rule in these cases. Indeed, it seems more likely than not that they are authorized to rule on these cases.

Hope this helps! Feel free to ask any other questions that you might have.