June 2004 LSAT
Section 3
Question 12
Some argue that because attaining governmental power in democracies requires building majority coalitions, it is a ne...
Replies
shunhe on January 9, 2021
Hi @andreaskormusis,Thanks for the question! So this is a strengthen with necessary premise question. First, identify the conclusion. The conclusion is that “[policymakers shifting policies] is more a benefit than an evil.” The first sentence sets forth an argument that the author then argues against in the second sentence. The premise the author uses the support her conclusion is that this shifting lets democracies adapt more easily to serve public interests.
Now take a look at (C), which says that the author assumes that when making government policy, adaptability is more important than strictly adhering to principle. Use the negation test. If (C) is negated, it means that adaptability is less important. Well, that means that shifting policies would be more an evil than a benefit. That would completely destroy the argument, and so (C) is the necessary assumption.
Hope this helps! Feel free to ask any other questions that you might have.
andreaskormusis on January 11, 2021
Thanks! I hope you guys can get onto putting these breakdowns into your answers ASAP. Those breakdowns are half the reason I'm able to improve and when we are left in the dark it's equivalent to telling us students were wrong and walking away. In the moment being able to read a breakdown of why I'm wrong is what truly helps me get the next questions right more frequently and I know most students are the same way.shunhe on January 21, 2021
Glad I was able to help! We are working on putting up the breakdowns, but thank you for the feedback!