June 2003 LSAT
Section 2
Question 2
shunhe on January 30, 2021
Hi @Chloe-Shoemaker,eversm on February 16, 2021
I think chloe was referring to the contrapositive of Rule 2 resulting that L could not be added firstjrb970 on April 8, 2021
If you look a rule two, it states that is Z1 --> L>O. The contrapositive to this is if O>L --> ~Z1. In either instance, L cannot be first. In the first scenario, Z must be first, and in the second scenario, O comes before L, so L cannot come first.