June 2010 LSAT
Section 5
Question 22
The passage states which one of the following?
Replies
mcapi012@diu.edu on March 18, 2021
Same, can someone answer!!!Parron on April 6, 2021
Agreed! I can't find this anywhere in the appDeanna on April 29, 2021
Same!!! I was just about to post the same question/concern. I don’t understand why the format was different and the video did not explain it. The way I had originally formatted this question was with the rules of “some, most, all” and S&N. Please someone explainon June 1, 2021
same questionon June 1, 2021
same questionPennie-Papamichael on July 26, 2021
i agree 100%!!!!Sandra on August 19, 2021
Can someone please answer this question.Ryn on November 19, 2021
Same, it seems like you all just did videos without referring back to what you have taught us. This is disappointing. Ans reviewers don't go into such detail about this, sigh.ajcaviness on February 8, 2022
^^!!!!Ravi on February 8, 2022
From the stimulus, we haveTulip-->older than any maple
Sycamore--most-->older than any maple
Maples-->older than dogwoods
So every tulip is older than every maple. Every maple is older than every dogwood. And we also know that most sycamores are older than all of the maples.
We can combine the first and third statements to conclude that every tulip is older than every dogwood.
Also, combining statements two and three, we can conclude that most sycamores are older than every dogwood.
Additionally, since every tulip is older than every maple, but only most sycamores are older than every maple, we know that there are some sycamores that are younger and all of the tulips.
This is how we arrive at E. We know that some sycamore are younger than all of the maples, and all of the maples are not as old as the youngest tulips. Thus, E has to be true.