Example 5

mcapi012@diu.edu March 18, 2021

Same, can someone answer!!!

Parron April 6, 2021

Agreed! I can't find this anywhere in the app

Deanna April 29, 2021

Same!!! I was just about to post the same question/concern. I don’t understand why the format was different and the video did not explain it. The way I had originally formatted this question was with the rules of “some, most, all” and S&N. Please someone explain

June 1, 2021

same question

June 1, 2021

same question

Pennie-Papamichael July 26, 2021

i agree 100%!!!!

Sandra August 19, 2021

Can someone please answer this question.

Ryn November 19, 2021

Same, it seems like you all just did videos without referring back to what you have taught us. This is disappointing. Ans reviewers don't go into such detail about this, sigh.

ajcaviness February 8, 2022

^^!!!!

Ravi February 8, 2022

From the stimulus, we have

Tulip-->older than any maple

Sycamore--most-->older than any maple

Maples-->older than dogwoods

So every tulip is older than every maple. Every maple is older than every dogwood. And we also know that most sycamores are older than all of the maples.

We can combine the first and third statements to conclude that every tulip is older than every dogwood.

Also, combining statements two and three, we can conclude that most sycamores are older than every dogwood.

Additionally, since every tulip is older than every maple, but only most sycamores are older than every maple, we know that there are some sycamores that are younger and all of the tulips.

This is how we arrive at E. We know that some sycamore are younger than all of the maples, and all of the maples are not as old as the youngest tulips. Thus, E has to be true.