September 1995 LSAT
Section 2
Question 10
Emil-Kunkin on September 27 at 01:18AM
I agree that there is a slight incongruity between the term eliminate and the passage- but it does still point out an issue with the argument. The author thinks that they won't eliminate something bad, they will only substitute it for something else bad. The argument is still incorrect for the second part- that it only substitutes. We can attack that rationale by showing that it does not only substitute, it actually reduces the amount. Im not sure how I see how this would be circular. The author didn't say if can never be extinct, only that robots will not eliminate it.