TUTORING SALE!
Get up to 20% Off
LSAT Tutoring
.
Testimonials
170+ Guarantee
Tutoring
Pricing
Sign In
Enroll
Free Trial
(855) 483-7862
Account
Log In
Free Trial
Courses
Tutoring
LSAT Supplements
LSAT Explanations App
Live Classes Subscription
Admissions Consulting
Invite a Friend
Get $100
Testimonials
170+ Guarantee
Company
Instructors
Guarantee
Financing Options
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
Free LSAT Resources
FAQs
Blog
Contact
Home
LSAT Prep
LSAT Message Board
June 2003 LSAT
Section 4
Question 26
It can be most reasonably inferred from the passage that the author holds that the recent studies discussed in the pa...
Nikki.M
on May 27, 2021
why not B
why not B
Reply
Create a free account to read and take part in
forum discussions.
Email Address
✓ Valid
invalid email
Already have an account?
log in
Emil-Kunkin
on March 21 at 12:11AM
I don't think this is at all about a long-standing procedural controversy in law. I just don't see anything in the passage to support the idea that this is a long-standing controversy, nor that this is really procedural. This seems more substantive.
GET $100