Testimonials
Pricing
Admissions
Sign In
LSAT Tutoring
(855) 483-7862
Account
Log In
Tutoring
Admissions Consulting
Invite a Friend
Get $100
Testimonials
170+ Guarantee
Company
Instructors
Guarantee
Live Class Library
Financing Options
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
Free LSAT Resources
FAQs
Blog
Contact
Home
LSAT Prep
LSAT Community
Back to Community
June 2003 LSAT - Section 4 - Question 26
It can be most reasonably inferred from the passage that the author holds that the recent studies discussed in the pa...
Nikki.M
May 27, 2021
why not B
why not B
Reply
Create a free account to read and take part in
forum discussions.
Email Address
✓ Valid
invalid email
Already have an account?
log in
Emil-Kunkin
March 21, 2024
I don't think this is at all about a long-standing procedural controversy in law. I just don't see anything in the passage to support the idea that this is a long-standing controversy, nor that this is really procedural. This seems more substantive.
GET $100
