September 2014 LSAT - Section 3 - Question 16
Naiem August 16, 2022
^I am also having a similar issue. Why couldn't this hypothetical work?Emil-Kunkin August 31, 2022
We know the Trent's must own S because of the final rule. Since the Ys cannot own the inn. Rule two tells us that I and F cannot be togetherJuliana June 3, 2023
I believe what the 3-1-1 scenario was referencing was ....Juliana June 3, 2023
Y: M*Emil-Kunkin June 4, 2023
Yep! That would be why the original question can't happen.