October 2010 LSAT
Section 1
Question 27
Emil-Kunkin on January 17, 2022
Hi @esmi, I think you may have interpreted the rule about lentils and mushrooms a bit differently than it was set up. The rule tells us that IF M3, then L6. This is not universal-it is not saying that m is always 3 and l is always 6, it is simply saying that in the case that M is 3 then we know that L is 6. The setup of question 3 tells us that L is 6, but this does not guarantee that M is three. That would just be reversing the rule that if M3 then L6, which we are not allowed to do. You can find more about this in the sufficient and necessary lesson as well.