June 2004 LSAT Section 3 Question 16

Everything that is commonplace and ordinary fails to catch our attention, so there are things that fail to catch our ...

medasmx@protonmail.com on December 14, 2021

makes no sense

some FCA are MN all OC are FCA you can have an instance where FCA-some-OC and FCA-some-MN but there are no OC which are MN

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Jay-Etter on January 22, 2022

If commonplace and ordinary -> fails to catch our attention
Conclusion: there are some things that fail to catch our attention and are miracles of nature.

What's the gap in the argument that the sufficient assumption needs to fill? That some miracles of nature meet the sufficient condition of being commonplace and ordinary.

Our sufficient assumption is some miracles of nature are ordinary and commonplace, so C.
When this is the case, then those same miracles of nature also fail to catch our attention, and therefore we get the conclusion that there are some things that are both miracles of nature and fail to catch our attention.