I certainly see where you are coming from, but there might be a gap between stating that someone has a dangerous point of view, and making a personal attack. By describing the point of view as dangerous, the author only makes a point about the view, but nothing about the people who hold that view. A personal attack would be along the lines of "You are a dangerous person so we can discount your point of view" The author is attaching an argument rather than the person making that argument.
While E does feel pretty weak, it could be a valid criticism- maybe this proposed project simply isn't comparable to the work done by Einstein or Maxwell.