Over the last few decades, public outcries against pollution have brought about stricter regulations of emissions. Th...

The correct answer choice uses causal language. I understand the linear nature of this argument. Outcries->regulations and regulations->improvements, therefore (answer: outcries ->improvements). However the causal language made choosing this answer seem dangerous to me. Could some elaborate when to see causal language as dangerous. Did the conditional nature of this passage allow for a causal inference to be made?