TUTORING SALE!
Get up to 20% Off
LSAT Tutoring
.
Testimonials
170+ Guarantee
Tutoring
Pricing
Sign In
Enroll
Free Trial
(855) 483-7862
Account
Log In
Free Trial
Courses
Tutoring
LSAT Supplements
LSAT Explanations App
Live Classes Subscription
Admissions Consulting
Invite a Friend
Get $100
Testimonials
170+ Guarantee
Company
Instructors
Guarantee
Financing Options
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
Free LSAT Resources
FAQs
Blog
Contact
Home
LSAT Prep
LSAT Message Board
December 2009 LSAT
Section 1
Question 20
Ethicist: Every moral action is the keeping of an agreement, and keeping an agreement is nothing more than an act of...
Tyler808
on August 7, 2022
Why is A wrong?
Explain
Reply
Create a free account to read and take part in
forum discussions.
Email Address
✓ Valid
invalid email
Already have an account?
log in
Emil-Kunkin
on August 8, 2022
Hi Tyler808,
The initial argument is as follows:
If MA -> KA
If KA -> SMB
Not all KA are MA
THUS: Some SMB are not MA
We could anonymize this as follows
If x then y
If y then Z
Not all Y are X
Thus: Some Z are not X
Let's look at A:
If calc then comp
If comp then AR
Not all AR are calc
THUS: some AR are not comp
And anonymized
If X then y
If Y then Z
Not all Z are X
Thus: not all Z are Y
This does not match our initial pattern, the conclusion is different.
GET $100