There is relatively little room for growth in the overall carpet market, which is tied to the size of the population....

Williamg August 12, 2022

Why not B?

Doesn't B exemplify dominant firms increasing their market share through aggressive marketing, thus directly contradicting the conclusion?

Replies

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Raheel July 10, 2024

Why not C either?

Emil-Kunkin July 20, 2024

I think b shows the opposite. It shows the market is saturated, and that there's no room to aggressively position and market a new product.

I'm not sure how c would matter. The outcome variable the author cares about is market share, not profitability.