June 1996 LSAT
Section 4
Question 16
Emil-Kunkin on February 22, 2023
Hi, while I don't disagree with your anticipation, I think we can show that W disagrees with H's assertion that the dance is not for food. While her initial assertion that Hs conclusion only points to the idea that it could be true that the dance relates to food, we should look at the rest of her argument. In it, she notes that the scent trails are supplementary, which I think implies that the thing they are supplementing is the dance.AndrewArabie on February 22, 2023
Ah yes. Thank you Emil. I think a closer reading of the question stem would've helped me out here