December 2005 LSAT
Section 1
Question 3
A recent study proves that at least some people possess an independent "sixth sense" that allows them to detect wheth...
Replies
AndrewArabie on April 21, 2023
I see my explanation for 274 was wrong but my question still remainsEmil-Kunkin on April 22, 2023
Hi, I think the difference is that in the other question you cited, the stat in question wasn't overall accuracy, but percent of correct yesses. That is, the station is measuring success only in terms of the number of times they correctly said it would rain, not in terms of overall correctness. If you say it will rain every day, then you will have correctly predicted every instance of rain even if your overall accuracy will be lower, since your measure of success ignores false positives.This question is concerned with overall success rates unlike the one in question. A doesn't really pass the so what test. Why does it matter if they usually said they were being watched? We have no idea from the passage as to the underlying rate of being watched or not.
That said C is a pretty soft strengthener. I think it strengthens by rebutting the possibility that people in the study with really good eyesight were able to see changes in shadow or reflection or use their peripheral vision to actually detect the person watching them.
AndrewArabie on April 22, 2023
Yes I agree the C is certainly the strengthener. My problem was just with A because it just seemed to me that answer choice A would have the same impact on the argument as the correct answer choice for question 274. But reading how you describe the difference makes total sense. Thank you!