October 2012 LSAT
Section 4
Question 14
Emil-Kunkin on July 20, 2023
Hi, I think the way B is worded is actually agnostic of what it is describing. It tells us that the author wrongly decides to accept one view instead of the other out of a set of two competing authorities. Here the two competing authorities are the two views mentioned in the passage, those of Tagar, and those of S and T. The two competing sets are referring to those views, and the author wrongly decides to assume that S and T are right, rather than considering the possibility that Tagar might be correct instead.