June 2007 LSAT
Section 4
Question 4
Emil-Kunkin on August 30, 2023
You just said exactly why it's E and not C. The author starts out fairly neutral in the first paragraph, but then explicitly come out in favor of melding disciplines in the first few lines of the second paragraph. The author also is clearly in favor of blending the two disciplines in the final paragraph. This is far from ambivalence, the author had a distinct view that was not neutral.@MichaelaJ on August 31, 2023
I think I understand. I had the correct train of thought but misunderstood the answer choice? Does Ambivalence mean "in favor" of a particular view rather than neutral?Emil-Kunkin on September 4, 2023
I think the opposite, that is, it means equivocal or neutral.