December 2013 LSAT
Section 2
Question 12
Emil-Kunkin on September 13, 2023
I think your understanding is correct. The only thing that the rule bans is a scenario where N and R/T are all out. The rule tells us nothing about a scenario where n is in. If n is in, it's possible that one of or both of r and t are also in.BibianaM on September 13, 2023
By N do you mean A?Emil-Kunkin on September 15, 2023
In that scenario it totally could. Remember that we only know what would happen if the sufficient condition is true. So, we know that if A is out then both r and t are in, and we know that if either r or t are out, then a is in. This tells us nothing about a scenario where r and a are in. In fact, all three could be in based on that rule.