Hi, I understand the logic of this question, I was just wondering if someone could share a strategy to speed up this question. Generally, when I have to test out multiple answer choices on logic games, I prioritize answer choices that are more promising to speed it up. However, for this question on this game, I could not find a quick way to eliminate even one without thinking through the scenario. I wondered if someone had some insight on how to quickly eliminate one or two of these, or even just which ones to prioritize on checking first. Thank you.
Replies
Create a free account to read and
take part in forum discussions.
So in general, I think youre doing the right thing, but there is one step that I'd add. After looking at the questions, see if they seem to be honing in on the same thing. In this case, it seems like they all really relate to the facilitator aspect of the game, not the red/green aspect. Once you determine this, I would try to take a look at how you can break the rules regarding that aspect.
Here we would need the two rules about who is an who isn't a facilitator. It looks like it's easier to break the rule that O is, we would simply need to put O with another facilitator. With that in mind, I would then scan the answer choices for something that has that effect.
This won't work for every cannot be true question, and in general, I think this is one of the more time consuming questions in games, but this is an approach that can help to cut some effort and time.
Vic04324on October 9 at 09:12PM
Once again, thank you, Emil! I really appreciate it.
