June 2015 LSAT - Section 3 - Question 23
Emil-Kunkin December 14, 2023
The argument makes quite the leap in its conclusion, that following the moon (which has no effect on its own) leads to a decreased likelihood in losing plants to a frost. In order for this to make sense, it must mean that one plants their plants later by following the moon than by following the first heat, since frost becomes less and less likely as time goes by. That is, in order for the argument to make sense, it must be the case that those who follow the moon tend to plant later.