August 2020 LSAT Section 3 Question 14

Food critic: One of the chief competitors of Chris's restaurant claims that Chris's okra supplier cannot reliably su...

nharkins1231 on December 19 at 11:34PM

Question 14 Prep Test 93

I do not understand how the answer is not A. The answer that is correct, seems like it would follow to the conclusion. But, A would mean that the competitor is only saying that because it is their competitor and it is obviously biased and does not show any evidence for this. I am just confused on how D is the answer.

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Emil-Kunkin on December 20 at 04:13PM

A is actually a common flaw. We cannot dismiss someone just because the person might have an incentive to say what they say. We must engage with the c,aim itself, not dismiss it out of hand because the party making the claim might be biased.