FLASH SALE!
Save big on
LSAT Courses
and
Tutoring
.
Testimonials
170+ Guarantee
Tutoring
Pricing
Sign In
Enroll
Free Trial
(855) 483-7862
Account
Log In
Free Trial
Courses
Tutoring
LSAT Supplements
Live Classes Subscription
Admissions Consulting
Invite a Friend
Get $100
Testimonials
170+ Guarantee
Company
Instructors
Guarantee
Live Class Library
Financing Options
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
Free LSAT Resources
FAQs
Blog
Contact
Home
LSAT Prep
LSAT Message Board
October 1993 LSAT
Section 2
Question 15
Lucien: Public–housing advocates claim that the many homeless people in this city are proof that there is insufficie...
Raheel
on March 6, 2024
E?
Why is E wrong?
Reply
Create a free account to read and take part in
forum discussions.
Email Address
✓ Valid
invalid email
Already have an account?
log in
Emil-Kunkin
on March 8, 2024
I don't think she offers an alternative explanation. While it is true that we can pretty easily infer one (that it relates to income and relative group income) but this isn't what M says. She only disputes a factual claim.
GET $100