I would describe this as some sort of part to whole or composition flaw. The core of the issue here is that while old people may have fewer reasons, the author wrongly focuses only on the number of reasons, but ignores how compelling they are. I wouldn't worry too much about being able to categorize, I think the most important thing is to be able to rephrase it in your own words.
iHAVE33FLAWSandAcommonLSATflawAINToneon April 24 at 03:52AM