June 2007 LSAT
Section 4
Question 16
Emil-Kunkin on May 2 at 03:18AM
I personally hate the phrase out of scope, because the reason an answer is wrong is WHY it's out of scope, not just that it is. So, the question is if the author is referring to how existing laws are applied, or to changing laws. Even if it's not clear from the immediate context, later on in the third paragraph we are told that copyright holders want to change the laws. Thus, dutifully enforced is wrong because the passage isn't suggesting that holders want better enforcement, but rather, different laws.iHAVE33FLAWSandAcommonLSATflawAINTone on May 3 at 01:36AM
Amazing, and I agree with your out-of-scope comment, nice to hear another supporter of that opinion!