Because it permits a slower and more natural rhythm of life, living in the country is supposed to be more healthy and...

Here's a clearer version of your message: Hi, I got confused by the question stem. I could tell that it was building toward the conclusion stated in answer choice A, but the question type was "Must Be True" rather than "Argument Completion." So I thought I needed to pick an answer that would make all the statements above true, which led me to treat it more like a paradox question. I chose C because if that statement is true, it explains how rural areas can still result in better health, while keeping the fact that rural residents get sick just as often consistent. I didn't think A had to be true because it seemed broader than the evidence the author provided. Just because people in rural areas get sick as often and experience similar levels of stress doesn't necessarily mean they aren't healthier or more relaxed overall. There could be plenty of other factors contributing to their better health and relaxation compared to city dwellers. This approach usually works for me in "Must Be True" questions, but it didn’t here. Could you provide some insight on how to handle this type of "Must Be True" question, where the argument seems to lead to a conclusion but doesn’t fully reach one? Or when opposing points are presented but undermined? I often find these situations tricky.