Which one of the following statements most accurately characterizes a difference between the two passages?

It stated that #1 was a fact while #2 and #3 are flawed arguments. This is incorrect. They are all flawed arguments. #1. Why is a carrot a vegetable? #1 does not specify what makes the carrot a vegetable, it is making an assumption. A fact would be a fruit. For example: A tomato is a fruit, why is a tomato a fruit because it has a seed and all fruits have seeds. While most people assume it is a vegetable because it grows from the ground it is in fact a fruit because it has a seed. All 3 examples in fact are flawed arguments.