Which one of the following, if substituted for the condition that Hamadi cannot be appointed to the same court as Per...

Theresaturner on November 4, 2015

Help

Please explain answer choice E. I don't understand how it brings about the same results as the third rule.

Replies

Create a free account to read and take part in forum discussions.

Already have an account? log in

Advaith on November 18, 2015

Could you please put up the question set and answers for this?

Emil-Kunkin on January 15, 2024

We know that K and L are on different courts, so to say that no three of KLHP can be together has the effect of saying that two of each must be on either court, which means HP can't be together.