Free LSAT Practice
LSAT Practice Test
LSAT Practice Test Videos
eBook: The Road to 180
Law School Top 100
LSAT Test Proctor
LSAT Logic Games
Apple App Store
Digital LSAT Simulator
Fee Waiver Scholarship
LSAT Test Dates
LSAT Message Board
December 2010 LSAT
Medications with an unpleasant taste are generally produced only in tablet, capsule, or soft-gel form. The active ing...
on February 4, 2016
Could you please explain?
I can't follow this argument. Thanks
on February 5, 2016
@dfolave the conclusion here is, "M will most likely be produced in capsule form."
The support provided for this conclusion?
Premise 1: Medications with an unpleasant taste are generally produced only in tablet, capsule, or soft-gel form.
Premise 2: The active ingredient in medication M is a waxy substance that cannot tolerate the heat used to manufacture tablets because it has a low melting point.
Premise 3: The company developing M does not have soft-gel manufacturing technology and manufactures all its medication itself.
Right away you should see there is a major gap in this argument.
We know that medications with AN UNPLEASANT TASTE are generally produced only in tablet, capsule, or soft-gel form.
The argument then presents evidence that tablet and soft-gel are not possible, thereby concluding that M will most likely be produced in capsule form.
However, for Premise 1 to apply here, M would have to be a medication with an unpleasant taste.
We are asked to identify the answer choice that most strongly supports the conclusion of the argument so this is a Strengthen question.
(B) does this by closing this gap, i.e. Medication M has an unpleasant taste.
To emphasize, the structure of this argument is as follows:
P1: MUT ==> T, C or SG
P2: not T
P3: not SG
(B) provides the missing premise, i.e. MUT.
Hope this helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
Posting to the forum is only allowed for members with active accounts.