December 1999 LSAT Section 2 Question 19
Mehran on February 25, 2016@kyleryman this is a Cannot Be True question, i.e. you are looking for the answer choice that is logically inconsistent with the columnist's conclusion.
Abigail on January 20 at 05:15PMHello Mehran, thank you for the explanation! But I still feel like A could work because it says the gov is taxing non essential equipment/ gear. The conclusion of this argument says that these things such as hunting gear, ski gear, etc shouldn't be taxed. Wouldn't A technically contradict this, potentially making it a correct answer choice?
Emil on January 22 at 11:51PMHi, the passage is about taxing things in order to decrease their use. It says nothing about taxing things to fund unrelated goals